Please Consider Voting NO on the Debt Exclusion Override
I urge you to vote NO on the proposed debt exclusion override.
This project would be funded entirely by Burlington taxpayers and would dramatically increase the town’s debt burden to unsustainable levels.
The Financial Impact
Burlington’s current bonded debt stands at approximately $83 million.
If we add the costs of the Fox Hill project, the new police station, and $333 million for the proposed high school, our total debt would climb to roughly $540 million — and that’s before including:
-
Burlington’s $10–20 million share of the upcoming Shawsheen Technical School project, and
-
Over $50 million in pending requests from the DPW, Recreation Department, Fire Department, and Conservation Commission.
The annual principal and interest payments on this debt would exceed $36 million per year for the next 20 years. For perspective, the entire town budget approved this past May was $187 million.
That means nearly one-fifth of our annual budget could soon be consumed by debt repayment alone.
Economic Headwinds
This level of borrowing is especially risky given current economic conditions.
Burlington’s commercial property vacancy rate is around 20%, driven by two ongoing challenges:
-
Amazon’s impact on brick-and-mortar retail, and
-
Post-COVID occupancy rates, which have not fully recovered.
Meanwhile, retail sales—both locally and nationally—are under significant pressure.
The rise of online shopping means that nearly 20% of all retail sales now occur online, a number that continues to grow. The trucks you see from Amazon and FedEx may deliver goods, but they don’t pay property taxes.
Even the Burlington Mall, once our retail anchor, reflects this transition: traditional retailers are being replaced by restaurants and service-based businesses.
Shifting Tax Burden
Another serious concern is the shift in our property tax base.
Residential property values are rising, while commercial valuations are declining.
A striking example occurred just last month: Northeastern University purchased 4 Burlington Woods from MetLife for $33 million — MetLife had bought the same property in 2022 for $103 million.
As a nonprofit, Northeastern will remove this property from the tax rolls entirely.
This is the canary in the coal mine — a warning that Burlington’s tax burden is shifting away from commercial property owners and onto residents. We can also expect an increase in tax abatement requests from struggling property owners.
Missing State Support
No Massachusetts municipality in recent memory has completed a school project of this magnitude without matching funds from the Massachusetts School Building Authority (MSBA).
We’ve been told that Burlington is not eligible for MSBA funding — but is that true?
-
Who made that determination?
-
Where are we on the MSBA’s list of applicants?
-
What efforts have our state representatives and senators made to advocate for funding?
Let’s remember that former Representative Charley Murphy successfully obtained MSBA funding for both the Marshall Simonds and Memorial school projects. There’s no reason we shouldn’t pursue similar support before committing Burlington taxpayers to hundreds of millions in debt.
A Responsible Path Forward
This project should be delayed until one or more of the following conditions are met:
-
Existing debt is paid down, reducing financial strain on the town;
-
State matching funds are secured through the MSBA; or
-
The proposal is downsized into a more affordable, incremental renovation or rehabilitation plan.
In Conclusion
Burlington deserves excellent schools — but also fiscal responsibility and sustainable planning.
Approving this override now would burden residents for decades, at a time when our commercial tax base is shrinking and our debt obligations are already at historic highs.
Let’s take the time to do this right — not just fast.
Please vote NO on the debt exclusion override.